Resarch Prof. Dr. Peter Kunzmann

Funding: Nds. Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur über Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 1.811.726 EUR

Project Details:
This initial project within the ZERN research and transfer network is dealing with the future-oriented keeping and use of fattening pigs. There are deficits in current fattening pig husbandry, particularly in the areas of animal welfare, emissions and nutrient efficiency. This project has therefore set the objective of scientifically evaluating relevant aspects of sustainable pork production synergistically and gaining new, practice-relevant knowledge.

Cooperation Partners:

Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik (DIL)

Funding: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, 625.000 EUR

Project Details:
As long as animal experiments cannot be completely replaced, the question will arise on which animals research should take place. In this project, an interdisciplinary working group wants to investigate the ELSA-relevant question, according to which criteria the selection of laboratory animal models takes place or should take place. The aim of the enterprise is to determine the manifold reasons for the choice of certain laboratory animals; the process is interdisciplinary in the full sense of the word and put the different rationalities into a well-founded correlation. The question condenses several open and important issues concerning the treatment of animals. The answer is to be examined in each of the disciplines involved, between them and finally in their association, whether it is possible to establish a coherent catalog of criteria that also creates clarity for the practice of animal experimentation, both for everyday research and at the interface to legislation and enforcement. This is important against the background of rapidly changing social value judgements about animals, which also lead to permanent tensions here. In this project we want to investigate the ELSA-relevant question of the criteria for the selection of laboratory animal models. We follow an interdisciplinary approach, which is represented by the following cooperation partners: Its members are: Prof. Dr. Peter Kunzmann (ethics), Prof. Dr. Bernhard Hiebl (laboratory animal science), Prof. Dr. Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede (infection research) (all TiHo- Hannover) and the legal scientist Prof. Dr. Dr. Tade Spranger (University of Bonn).

Cooperation Partners:

Tade Spranger, Rechts- und Staatswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Bonn

Funding: BLE, 812.500 EUR

Project Details:
Pig diseases and injuries occur in all housing systems. Intensive care or treatment does not always result in healing so that animals have to be killed to avoid further pain or suffering. The Animal Protection Act fundamentally stipulates the protection of animal lives and well-being. In the case of serious diseases or injuries, the deci-sion which subject of protection needs to be preferred is inevitable. For pig farmers, the decision concerning killing an animal is considerably challenging. The aim of this project is to define simply collectable and valid criteria with which the well-being of diseased pigs can be accurately assessed and a responsible, justified decision can be made regarding the killing. The criteria should define the earliest possible time-point in the course of a disease at which an impairment of the well-being for protecting life is no longer acceptable and emergency killing becomes inevitable. The decision regarding the killing requires in addition an ethical evaluation, which includes safeguarding interests of the pig owners. The project should depict the complex process of decision-making concerning the killing of diseased pigs exem-plary for relevant diseases or injuries. Diseased or injured pigs of various age groups should be monitored during the entire course of disease by means of clinical exam-inations and supplementary photo and video documentation in order to generate data sets, which make a decision regarding the killing understandable. Finally, prac-ticable, illness-/injury-specific criteria catalogues should be compiled for livestock pigs and integrated in a training concept. A further aim of the project is to analyse the reasons why pig farmers have wrongly assessed the health status of affected animals. The training concept should therefore directly deal with these reasons.

Cooperation Partners:

ISN Projekt GmbH, Damme

Funding: Rentenbank, 90.000 EUR

Project Details:
The project aims at the integration of animal welfare as a constant dimension in the concept of sustainability. The work is done on conceptional levels and by use of case studies of selected kind of farm animals.

Results:

Using one of the resulting models, we can show that animal welfare is a protected good among many other sustainability goods, but due to its categorical difference it cannot be implemented as an equivalent element alongside the other sustainability dimensions in a sustainability concept. We were therefore unable to achieve a "genuine" integration of animal welfare as a constitutive component, but we were able to achieve a meaningful positioning via the social dimension of sustainability as a connecting link.

Since a decision is required in the case of conflicting objectives despite categorical differences, we have developed a reflection model as a proposal for dealing with this problem, which can serve as a basis for weighting in the case of value preference decisions. We have demonstrated its applicability in detail using a specific example.

Overall, we have been able to clearly distinguish ourselves from other concepts in the current sustainability discourse, among other things through the well-founded selection of arguments that can be applied from an ethical perspective.

The absolute goal of the sustainability debate in connection with animal husbandry and animal welfare is not clearly discernible from the discourse situation, so that there is still motivation to participate by contributing valid arguments.

 

Using one of the resulting models, we can show that animal welfare is a protected good among many other sustainability goods, but due to its categorical difference it cannot be implemented as an equivalent element alongside the other sustainability dimensions in a sustainability concept. We were therefore unable to achieve a "genuine" integration of animal welfare as a constitutive component, but we were able to achieve a meaningful positioning via the social dimension of sustainability as a connecting link.

Since a decision is required in the case of conflicting objectives despite categorical differences, we have developed a reflection model as a proposal for dealing with this problem, which can serve as a basis for weighting in the case of value preference decisions. We have demonstrated its applicability in detail using a specific example.

Overall, we have been able to clearly distinguish ourselves from other concepts in the current sustainability discourse, among other things through the well-founded selection of arguments that can be applied from an ethical perspective.

The absolute goal of the sustainability debate in connection with animal husbandry and animal welfare is not clearly discernible from the discourse situation, so that there is still motivation to participate by contributing valid arguments.

The design of a model with a high degree of concretization that adequately takes animal welfare into account is currently considerably limited by the fact that objectively measurable thresholds are not yet available.

Funding: BMBF, 45.234 EUR

Project Details:
The focus is on the problem that we classify animals according to human standards, such as those we love and those we fight against. Protecting humans from diseases that originate in the animal kingdom requires measures that are maximally detrimental to animals. The retreat weeks will focus on current and controversial research into zoonoses. Ethics and moral philosophy must also provide answers to the question of what boundaries we should draw for ourselves in these difficult decisions and what criteria we should use as a basis. The results are to be bundled into a model that can be used both as a model for questions in the scientific community and as a touchstone for academic discourse on an appropriate relationship to the "animal"

Results:

Triggered by COVID-19, zoonoses have moved into the spotlight of public interest.

In zoonosis research in particular, it is important to weigh up the potential benefits for humans against the actual harm to laboratory animals.

During a retreat week, experts discussed and prepared helpful contributions on conflicts in the field of "zoonosis research on companion animals". Based on real case constellations, an argumentative path through the numerous value contradictions was shown, which represents an extreme condensation of fundamental animal ethical conflicts based on real, concrete scenarios.

The project initially dealt with the clarification of terms: what makes an animal a laboratory animal, what makes it a pet? Where do the terms overlap and what is the legal situation in different countries?

The special nature of companion animals in the context of zoonoses was explored in an ethical and scientific manner. Younger researchers in particular were confronted with the ethical aspect of zoonosis research for the first time and found an ethical exchange on the topic very helpful.

The results of the project were documented in the special issue of the Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research published in fall 2023 and provide a good basis for a refined model for future interdisciplinary writing projects. A continuation of the project from summer 2024 in the form of European summer schools is planned.

Funding: Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, 166.732 EUR

Project Details:
Der Verantwortungsraum von Berater/Innen wird bestimmt und Empfehlungen an die Hand gegeben, wie eine verantwortungsbewusste Beratung konkret umgesetzt werden kann. Es werden Konzept und Material für Fortbildungsangebote entwickelt, die zum einen Verantwortung von Berater/innen verdeutlichen und zum anderen auch die tierethischen Aspekte in der Beratung vermitteln.

Funding: Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, 166.732 EUR

Project Details:
The area of responsibility of advisors is determined and recommendations are given on how responsible advice can be implemented in practice. A concept and material for further training courses will be developed which, on the one hand, clarify the responsibility of advisors and, on the other hand, also convey the animal ethical aspects of advice.

Results:

The provision of advice to farms plays an important role in establishing animal welfare measures in livestock farming. One of the aims of the project was to identify the interrelationships of responsibility in advisory services. To this end, the areas of responsibility were first determined, e.g. in the design of the advisory process or in the decision and implementation of the advisory content.

As values can influence the guidance process, it is always important for guidance practitioners to be clear about their values, whereby it is also important to differentiate between their own values and those of the employer. Critical reflection is an important tool for this. Significant values were identified during the project.

A framework was also created with regard to animal welfare/animal protection, which shows the responsibility of advisors. In the course of this, it was possible to outline the approaches that animal welfare advice must pursue in order to meet the requirements for good advice and to be able to provide sustainable approaches for greater animal welfare.

When discussing animal welfare/animal protection, there are always conflicts of objectives.

It is very important for the success of an advisory service that these conflicting goals are identified.A decision-making cascade developed in the project is intended to provide a remedy here, which is intended to encourage reflection throughout the advisory activity.

The project developed a training program that has already been successfully tested in practice. It dealt with the thematic blocks entitled "Consultancy in the knowledge system of agriculture", "Fundamentals of animal ethics", "Responsibility and scope for responsibility in consultancy", "Values and requirements for ethically "good" consultancy", "Animal welfare and animal protection in consultancy" and "Conflicting objectives and the decision-making cascade".

The extremely large number of advisors from both official and private advisory services who attended the event showed the great interest in this topic in the run-up to the event and thus also the need to address it among advisors.

The project has thus succeeded in defining the area of responsibility of counselors and providing them with recommendations on how responsible counseling can be implemented. The training program clarifies the responsibility of advisors and highlights the importance of advice for animal welfare and animal protection.

Funding: Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft , 190.960 EUR

Project Details:
Animals have become a core moral issue in Western societies. All those who earn their money from animals should be able to think through their position and present it in a well-considered manner. However, the experiences of recent years also show how relatively quiet the voices from agriculture are in an ever louder concert on this topic. In this sense, a solid project on ethics in livestock farming serves the purpose of self-positioning internally and the ability to engage in discourse externally. The basis of the project is to be a well-founded, applied ethical analysis of the current debate on animal husbandry, from which a handbook will be centrally produced.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Results:

EthOrNu should offer "ethical orientation for livestock farming" in several respects: It should make the moral discourses in society more understandable for those involved who earn their money from livestock farming, and at the same time create an offer to position themselves in these discourses. Conversely, it is intended to open up relevant agricultural expertise for those interested in ethical issues and to help them make informed judgments about animal husbandry. The novelty lies in this bridge, which can be crossed from both sides. Only by combining both elements is it possible to make a competent assessment of the real and concrete conditions in livestock farming. The central building block for this is the creation of a handbook that presents relevant knowledge in an attractive way for both sides and opens up the possibility of further use. From the handbook, it will be possible to develop materials that also make the results accessible for the specific (initial, further and continuing) training of livestock farmers. Furthermore, central contents and theses from the project were tested in the field, e.g. in a larger presentation of the "decision cascade" at the Animal Welfare Day in Triesdorf (April 2022). The collaboration with the "Responsibility of advisors in livestock farming" project also made it possible to discuss the key ethical content of the handbook with a highly interesting target group, namely agricultural advisors, at several workshops.

Funding: Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur, 97.745 EUR

Project Details:
The ongoing dispute over the future of livestock has enormous economic relevance in a state like Lower Saxony; in the livestock-rich regions, the issue is also becoming socially explosive. The issue is a major concern for society.
The aim of the project is to objectify the debate and contribute to a deeper understanding of the positions. The core of the project consists of analyzing the content and positions of animal husbandry and relating them to their own ability to engage in discourse.

Results:

The project locates and analyzes reasons for moments of failure and escalation in the farm animal discourse. At the same time, perspectives for its improvement are identified in order to point out possible turning points towards a more peaceful, respectful and constructive discussion about so-called farm animals.

The main results of the project are a discourse path as a suggested outline and a flyer with rules for discussion, which can be viewed on the website https://wiemenschenuebertierestreiten.jimdofree.com/.

Funding: Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, 50.000 EUR

Project Details:
The projects`main question is if, why and how the welfare of farm animals is connected to the idea of sustainability and if animals`interests are playing a role in the present discussions on sustainability.

Results:

In current sustainability concepts, animals and animal welfare are only indirectly addressed in places, although this preliminary study has shown that their inclusion is socially desirable or even demanded. The extent to which the anthropocentric sustainability goals and the welfare of farm animals can be meaningfully linked will be the subject of a follow-up project.